This is the account of the discovery of a skull that has the potential to change what we know about human evolution, and a suppression and cover-up which followed.
In 1959, in an area called Chalkidiki in Petralona, Northern Greece, a shepherd came across a small opening to a cave, which became visible when a thick covering of snow finally melted. He gathered a group of villagers to help him clear the entrance so they could go inside and explore. They found a cave rich in stalactites and stalagmites. But they also found something surprising – a human skull embedded in the wall (later research also uncovered a huge number of fossils including pre-human species, animal hair, fossilized wood, and stone and bone tools).
The skull was given to the University of Thessaloniki in Greece by the President of the Petralona Community. The agreement was that once the research was done, a museum would be opened featuring the findings from the Petralona cave, and the skull would be returned to be displayed in the museum – something that never happened.
Dr Aris Poulianos, member of the UNESCO's IUAES (International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences), later founder of the Anthropological Association of Greece, and an expert anthropologist who was working at the University of Moscow at the time, was invited by the Prime Minister of Greece to return to Greece to take a position of a University Chair in Athens. This was due to the publication of his book, ‘The Origins of the Greeks’, which provides excellent research showing that Greek people didn’t originate from the Slavic nations but were indigenous to Greece. Upon his return to Greece, Dr Poulianos was made aware of the discovery of the skull at Petralona, and immediately started studying the Petralona cave and skull.
The ‘Petralona man’, or Archanthropus of Petralona, as it has since been called, was found to be 700,000 years old, making it the oldest human europeoid (presenting European traits) of that age ever discovered in Europe. Dr Poulianos’ research showed that the Petralona man evolved separately in Europe and was not an ancestor of a species that came out of Africa.
In 1964, independent German researchers, Breitinger and Sickenberg, tried to dismiss Dr Poulianos’ findings, arguing that the skull was only 50,000 years old and was indeed an ancestor that came from Africa. However, research published in the US in 1971 in the prestigious Archaeology magazine, backed up the findings that the skull was indeed 700,000 years old. This was based on an analysis of the cave’s stratigraphy and the sediment in which the skull was embedded. Further research in the cave discovered isolated teeth and two pre-human skeletons dating back 800,000 years, as well as other fossils of various species.
Today, most academics who have analyzed the Petralona remains say that the cranium of the Archanthropus of Petralona belongs to an archaic hominid distinguished from Homo erectus, and from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, but showing characterists of all those species and presenting strong European traits. A skull dating back 700,000 which is either Homo sapien or part Homo sapien is in direct conflict with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution.
Further excavations continued in the cave of Petralona with the participation of international researchers (46 specialists from 12 separate countries), which provided further proof of Dr Poulianos’ claims, including remarkable findings like fossilized pieces of wood, an oak leaf, animal hair and coprolites, which enabled accurate dating, as well as the almost continuous presence of stone and bone tools of the Archanthropus evolutionary stage, from the lower (750,000 years) to the upper (550,000 years) layers of sediment within the cave.
The research, after an interruption due to the dictatorship in Greece, continued up to 1983. It was then ordered by the government that all excavations at the site were forbidden to anyone, including the original archaeological team, and for 15 years nobody had access to the site or to the findings – no reason was provided by the government. Was this denial of access to prevent the extraction of whatever new scientific conclusions remained hidden within the incredible fossils embedded within the layers of the caves’ walls?
After the Anthropological Society of Greece took the case to the courts, 15 years later they were again allowed access to the cave. Since then the Ministry of Culture is trying in any way to overcome the Courts decision and further trials proceed.
Dr Poulianos’ findings contradicted conventional views regarding human evolution and his research was suppressed. Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home in 2012 and the culprits were never found. He and his team have been denied further access to the cave to complete their research and study, and the whereabouts of the skull is now unknown.
Today a sign sits outside the cave of Petralona stating that the skull found in the cave was 300,000 years old, and on Wikipedia today you will see references dismissing the evidence and trying to date the Petralona skull within acceptable parameters – between 160,000 and 240,000 years old.
Recently, Professor C.G. Nicholas Mascie-Taylor of the University of Cambridge sent a letter to the Ministry of Culture in Greece saying that the correct date of the skull is 700,000 years old and not 300,000. He has also challenged the government’s suppression of information regarding this incredible discovery.
The Greek Ministry of Education, Religions, Culture and Sports,
Bouboulinas 20-22,
Athens 106 82,
Greece
5 September 2012
Dear Sir,
I am writing on behalf of the European Anthropological Association, which is the umbrella professional and academic association linking all of the national European biological anthropology and human biology societies, to express our concerns about the conservation of the Petralona Cave and Skull, the misinformation of the dating of the skull, as well as the treatment of personnel associated with the conservation of the Cave.
The bases of our concerns are that the skull has been damaged through many scratches and the crown of a tooth (1st molar) cut off. As requested by Anthropological Association of Greece what is required is a detailed description of the present status of the skull, so that no one in future can arbitrarily damage it further. There is also the problem of dating which has been scientifically dated at about 700,000 years ago not 300,000 as is given at the information desk. There is a very detailed record of the excavations and findings which need to receive further public presentation but which have never been catalogued so as to prevent specimens going missing.
It is very unfortunate that the Greek Archaeological Department stopped Dr Aris Poulianos from further work in the Cave without any explanation. It is also very worrying that Dr Poulianos and his wife were physically attacked and injured in their home earlier this year and the culprits have not been found. He was also verbally abused when attempting to give an invited presentation to teachers and school children.
Senior anthropologists and geologists have also been denied access to the Cave and the specimens for further study on a number of occasions without substantive reasons. Earlier this year there has also been misinformation given to the Greek Parliament concerning financial aspects of the Cave.
I look forward to receiving answers to these questions.
Yours faithfully
Professor C G N Mascie-Taylor MA, PhD, ScD (all Cambridge), FSB, FNAS (Hungary)
Professor of Human Population Biology and Health and President of the European Anthropological Association
The most important conclusion of Dr Poulianos' research regards the co-existence of all main anthropological types (African – Kobi, Asian – Beijing and European – Petralona) at the same almost period (700,000, 500,000 and 750,000 respectively). That means: the appearance of the today human main populations (races or even better phyllae - from the Greek language and that’s why polyphyletic etc) is tending to almost 1,000,000 m.y.a. and not to only 10,000 or 30,000 years as currently considered world wide.
However, independently if there is a scientific dispute on the above, it is only sad to become aware that research is not allowed to those who are not coordinated to the “standard” knowledge, risking even their lives in front of gun shooters.
Is this a cover up of an incredible discovery that the powers-that-be do not want us to have access to? You be the judge.
Update from editor 31 December, 2018: Dr Poulianos wrote to Ancient Origins to state that unfortunately the suppression of information regarding the Petralona skull has continued:
“Experiencing the above I am asserting that the prohibition of research regarding human history is due to the following (most obvious, i.e. not exposing political) reasons:
Various (Worldwide) Universities and their state allied forums have the power to influence all of the small range national institutions in order to achieve the aforementioned prohibition. In turn, this is most probably due to the fact that such research is allowed only to some “confidential” persons. Thus, re-righting chapters of human history is only their “right”. Whoever does not belong to such clubs and / or forums has to be stopped by all existing means, even by falsifying the truth against well documented evidence (i.e. without providing any scientific contradicting argument). Obviously I am asserting that knowledge is under control, especially what concerns human history. Therefore I agree with Lenie Reedijk’s description regarding the “Cover Up”, as well as the following comments to her article.”
By John Black
Related Links
The 40th Anniversary since the discovery of the Petralona Archanthropus' skull
The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece
Related Videos



Comments
Archaeology is done in europe only to suppress facts
Permalink
Sorry if i offend anybody, but findings in done in europe only to suppress facts, since scientific findings begin by newly rich colonial powers with money robbed from asian countries like India, china, Hence scientists are bound to schedule all findings related human origins as per Bible only
LOAN OFFER!!! CONTACT US IF YOU ARE INTERESTED
Permalink
Hello,
Are you tired of Seeking Loans and Mortgages, have you been turned down constantly By your banks and other Financial Institutions or micro finance scheme. This is to let you know with 100% guarantee that we Offer loans ranging from $ 2,000 to $ 500,000,000 at 3% interest rate per Month. We give out LOANS for developing business a competitive edge/business expansion.
Be rest assure that We are certified, trustworthy, reliable, efficient, Fast and dynamic. and a co-operate financier for real estate and any kinds of business financing, we give out long term loan for 6 Month to 30 years maximum and all interest rate and calculate and allow to be pay annually.
We offer the following kinds of loans and many more; We offer the following loans to individuals-
*Personal Loans
*Commercial Loans
*Investments Loans
*Development Loans
*Consolidation Loans
*Student Loans
*Car Loans
*Mortgage Loans
*Acquisition Loans
*Construction loans
Business Loans And many More: If you are highly interested in our loan offer, kindly contact us via our e-mail id below. ( [email protected] )
[email protected]
Mr. George Coleman
I agree with the bulk of what
Permalink
In reply to Origins... by Elmoor (not verified)
I agree with the bulk of what you are saying. I'm curious about the one where you said
the origin of europeans themselves is also the bantu/khoi/san peoples etc and these peoples are also the ancestors of the Moors etc... these people are most likely the ancestors of all humanity
That line can be taken a few different ways because you worded that. Are you stating respectably that humans are a form and before they developed certain set complexions and facial features that we just branched out? or are you coming back to the out of africa theory when you say these peoples are most likely the ancestors of all humanity while you don't make totally clear who "these peoples" are, as you have named various groups among them Europeans.
Wether or not you believe the skull is human, I've seen plenty of people credit non human skulls as proof of human origins and make excuses as to skull erosion as to why it's condition is the way it is...which one could say that forehead doesn't seem visible (although it is at a downwards angle in the first photo, but when it is in the case you can see more of a forehead better.)
I don't believe one set of people came before any other, As people have previously stated the Multi Regional Theory is the only one that presents validity without all the hate that comes with the all world accepted sciences.
Origins...
Permalink
Most argument is half-thought-through. You who are proud of your europeanness as opposed to mere whiteness, or whatever post-colonial/industrial identity was thrust upon you by banker-run bureaucrats, must realize that the origin of europeans themselves is also the bantu/khoi/san peoples etc and these peoples are also the ancestors of the Moors etc... these people are most likely the ancestors of all humanity.... Maybe there was a separate human development that accounts for whatever 'caveman' existed and encountered high-brow civilization (high-brow referring to the high forehead that primates DO NOT have)
The oldest skulls and bones found in europe and the world over are those with prognostic septum's. This prognathic feature is the basis for the knee-jerk colonial assertion that 'blacks' descend from apes.
The problem with humanity today is half education..... The ruling elite want it this way... They can privately recognize THEIR origins as the same as the people they sit on as a class while the lower classes. like crabs in a barrel, feeling shame and resentment from cognitive dissonance, fight with others they think they are better than or with those they think are better than them when in fact all humanity are distant cousins... Nations or rather corrupt leaders of representational govts create 'interests' for which one group is willing to kill members of another group....
BTW that skull has no forehead meaning its not a human skull.
TYR
Permalink
In reply to Neanderthal Europeans Americans by riparianfrstlvr
With the blending of the aryan Religion with swedish worshippers of Frey and Freya, (King Gylfi was an Yngling who claimed descendance of Yngvi Frey), Tyr the warriors God was replaced with Frey, the farming God, as well Frigga was pushed aside by Freya.
But as the difference between humans is mostly spiritual and Science is materialistic we try to find differences in the Body (which are plenty), but the difference between a white mens Body and a Black mens Body are as Big as both difference to a Monkey. Well, then where is the border between monkeys and any Type of Human?
It is spiritual, but no scientist wants to go there.
Pagination